Sapphire Intros Radeon RX 6500 XT Graphics Card with Off-Spec 8GB Memory

See the full post here ➡️ https://www.techpowerup.com/297157/sapphire-intros-radeon-rx-6500-xt-graphics-card-with-off-spec-8gb-memory

Rate this post

Sapphire introduced one of the first Radeon RX 6500 XT graphics cards in the retail channel to feature 8 GB of video memory, double that of the 4 GB standard for the SKU. The Sapphire Pulse RX 6500 XT 8 GB resembles the company’s standard Pulse RX 6500 XT in design. At this point it’s unclear how Sapphire went about deploying 8 GB of memory with the RX 6500 XT, given its narrow 64-bit GDDR6 memory interface.

Sapphire probably used four 16 Gbit memory chips, with two chips piggybacking a 32-bit memory channel. This would finally put the metal backplate to some use, as two of the chips could be located on the reverse side of the PCB. The memory ticks at the same 18 Gbps speed as the standard RX 6500 XT. The card’s typical board power is increased to 130 W, up from the 107 W AMD reference. This is probably because the added memory chips, as well as slightly increased clock speeds of 2685 MHz (game clock), vs. 2615 MHz reference. The company didn’t announce pricing or availability, but is planning a global launch for this card.


Why should you share your news?

Contributing is one of the best ways to promote a website. This technique has been used for decades now and is still very effective. But, this strategy can make or break your rankings depending on its application.

A news website is one of the best places to publish your blog. This is because such sites always have massive amounts of targeted traffic. If you write quality content, your post will get many hits, and many people will follow your blog.

Disclaimer

The content provided has been modified and is not displayed as intended by the author. Any trademarks, copyrights, and rights remain with the source. Linux Chatter sources content from RSS feeds and personal content submissions. The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect Linux Chatter.